Printed circuit boards and their assemblies (PCB & PCBA) are the core components of electronic products, and their reliability directly determines the overall reliability of electronic products. To ensure and enhance the quality and reliability of electronic products, it is essential to carry out comprehensive physical and chemical analyses of failures, identify the underlying failure mechanisms, and then propose corresponding improvement measures. MTT possesses profound technical expertise in board-level failure analysis, a complete range of analytical methods, a vast database of case studies, and a team of experienced experts, providing you with high-quality and efficient failure analysis services.
The purpose of electronic component failure analysis is to employ a variety of testing and analytical techniques and procedures to identify the failure phenomena of electronic components, determine their failure modes and mechanisms, identify the ultimate root cause of failure, and propose recommendations for improvements in design and manufacturing processes. This helps prevent the recurrence of failures and improves the overall reliability of the components.
The continuous rise in complexity and performance requirements of integrated circuits, combined with potential risks across design, manufacturing, packaging, and application stages, has led to frequent occurrences of critical failure modes such as short circuits, open circuits, leakage, burnout, and parameter drift. These issues not only result in costly device scrapping and system downtime but also often trigger disputes over responsibility among designers, foundries, packaging and testing houses, and end-users, causing significant economic losses and reputational risks.
The performance requirements for polymer materials continue to rise, while differences in understanding of high-demand products and processes between customers and suppliers often lead to frequent failures such as fracture, cracking, corrosion, and discoloration. These failures frequently cause disputes over responsibility and result in significant economic losses.
The increasingly harsh service environments of metal components place higher demands on material performance and structural reliability. However, factors such as design flaws, material defects, manufacturing deviations, or improper use can readily trigger typical failures including fatigue fracture, stress corrosion cracking, hydrogen embrittlement, creep, wear, and overload deformation.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Consult a professional engineer immediately for your service
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Consult a professional engineer immediately for your service
Meixin Testing leverages its technological edge in constructing massive failure databases, showcasing its capabilities through comprehensive case studies, solutions for complex scenarios, partnerships with leading enterprises, and systematic intellectual property. Drawing on millions of failure analyses, it delivers precise insights into root causes, enabling inspection reports to provide robust support for clients' quality upgrades and achieve zero failures.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Consult a professional engineer immediately for your service
Stay updated with the latest news from Maxin Testing, including technical developments, exhibitions, and events. We build on a foundation of professional testing to deliver customized solutions for our clients, ensuring quality control from the source. This empowers our clients to stand out in the marketplace and achieve commercial success.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Consult a professional engineer immediately for your service
MTT is a nationally accredited commercial third-party laboratory. We specialize in providing testing services, technical consulting services, and solution services to clients across industries including electronics manufacturing, automotive electronics, semiconductors, and aerospace materials.
Maxin Testing operates laboratory facilities in Shenzhen, Suzhou, and Beijing, featuring multidisciplinary testing and analytical laboratories. The company pioneers an industrial hospital service model grounded in materials science engineering and electronic reliability engineering.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Consult a professional engineer immediately for your service
Professional verification platform, delivering precise data insights to build a solid foundation of trust for investors.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Consult a professional engineer immediately for your service
Overlooked this in PCB design? Beware of capacitors going on a collective strike!
Release date: 2025-04-02 00:00
Share to:

After the aging test, a product found that the standby working current is abnormally increased. After detailed analysis, it was determined that the problem stemmed from the abnormality of the C6 capacitor (the capacitor of the specific position or function on the circuit board). In order to comprehensively and deeply explore the root cause of C6 capacitance failure, we have adopted a series of professional and systematic detection methods to carry out failure analysis work.

Image

1. Appearance Check & X-ray Perspective

The surface of the failed capacitor capacitor does not find obvious cracks, damage and other abnormal phenomena, excluding the failure caused by factors such as external force impact of the capacitor. Use X-ray to perform perspective inspection of the failure capacitor, and no obvious structural abnormalities were found.

Image

2. Electrical Parameter Testing

The failure capacitance resistance is less than 2kΩ, which is much less than the unused capacitance resistance, indicating that the failure capacitor has obvious leakage phenomenon, as shown in Table 1 of the test result.

Image


3. Thermal EMMI Hotspot Positioning

It was found that there are obvious abnormal highlights inside the failure capacitor, and the highlights are mainly concentrated on the side of the electrode near the capacitance end.

Image

4. Sliced analysis

(1) The position where the NG1 capacitor shows abnormal bright spots in the hot spot has obvious cracks. Further grinding to the inner electrode is revealed, and the crack is found to pass through the intersection of the inner electrode, resulting in a short circuit or low resistance channel between the upper and lower layers of the inner electrode. Compared with the slicing of different locations, with the gradual grinding to the inside of the capacitor, the cracks gradually become smaller, indicating that the origin of the crack expansion should be close to the outside of the capacitor. In addition, the microscopic morphology observes that the cracks are fine, and no melting and burning phenomenon is seen, which is presumed to be mechanical stress cracks.

(2) NG2, NG3 are found on the bottom side of the capacitor crack, and extended to the inner electrode area to cause the capacitor layer between the leakage short circuit, the position and hot spot abnormal bright spot corresponding. The crack originated from the bottom surface end electrode, and its angle and the bottom angle is close to 45 °, which is a typical mechanical stress cracking morphology.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


5. Material verification

According to the specification book, the three-point bending test is carried out to confirm the appearance and electricality of the capacitor after the experiment, and no obvious abnormalities are found. The slice analysis of #1 and #2 capacitors has not been found to have obvious cracks, medium layer holes and other defects. Therefore, the material can meet its specifications.

Image

Image

Image

Image

6. Simulation experiment

In order to confirm whether the internal crack of the failure capacitor is a mechanical stress crack, the #3 and #4 capacitors continue to bend simulation test for the three-point bending, and the capacitance is slicing analysis after the test.

The slicing results show that when the substrate is bent at 4mm, there are obvious cracks in the interior of the #3 and #4 capacitors, and its position originates from the end electrode position and is 45° with the welding surface, which is basically the same as the internal cracking morphology characteristics of the failure capacitor. Therefore, it is inferred that the failure capacitor is subjected to a large external stress, and then cracks occur internally.

Image

Image

7. Analysis and Summary

Analysis: The reason for the mechanical stress crack inside the capacitor is that because the capacitive porcelain body is made of hard and brittle ceramic material, this material is more sensitive to the stress generated by the deformation of the single plate. When the capacitor is subjected to additional stress, the crack will be generated at the stress concentration point, as shown in Figure 15, if the device is subjected to upward stress, the bottom weld end and the welding end of the intersection at the junction of the welding end is the stress concentration point, this position becomes a weak link, easy to produce a crack with the welding end of 45° or "Y" font, and vice versa.

Image

Summary: The main reason for the failure of the capacitor is that the cracks that are extended to the inter-internetized electrode by external stress are formed, resulting in a decrease in the resistance value caused by the leakage channel.

8. Recommendation

Check the external stress sources in the process of capacitance assembly, testing, etc.


Relevant cases
Still failing despite meeting IPC standards? The OSP film thickness tolerance vulnerability overlooked by 90% of factories
After undergoing two reflow temperatures, OSP pads exhibited severe solderability issues during wave soldering. Reducing the reflow temperature resolved the solderability problems. This paper analyzes the failure causes and mechanisms of solderability defects on OSP pads and proposes improvement recommendations.
The Truth Behind the 30% Surge in FPC Lead-Free Failure Rates | The “Invisible Killer” of Consumer Electronics
A certain FPC exhibited routing shallowing at certain locations, with both the edges and central areas of the defective samples showing this phenomenon. This paper will conduct a systematic failure analysis to identify the root cause of routing shallowing in the FPC.
Silicone Exceeding Limits = EU Sales Ban? With Global Regulations Tightening, Is Your Product Compliant?
Siloxanes are a class of organosilicon compounds containing Si-O-Si bonds, widely used in rubber, detergents, polishes, adhesives, sealants, and other fields. Due to the environmental and health risks associated with certain siloxanes, numerous countries and regions worldwide have enacted regulations to control their use.
Save Millions! Practical Tips for Avoiding Pitfalls in Metal Material Selection (Part 2)
In the previous article, “Choosing the Wrong Metal = Burning Money! A Guide to Avoiding Pitfalls in Metal Material Selection for Electronics (Part 1),” we established a knowledge framework for metal material properties and applications, and outlined the core steps for scientific material selection. However, theory must be tested by practice. This article will focus on the practical aspects: How can advanced inspection technologies provide reliable data support for material selection decisions? How can performance and cost be skillfully balanced in projects? Real-world case studies will reveal the consequences of improper material selection and the solutions to address them.
Choosing the Wrong Metal = Burning Money! A Guide to Avoiding Pitfalls in Metal Selection for Electronics (Part 1)
In electronic products, the selection of metal components directly impacts product performance, safety, and lifespan. From smartphone casings to aircraft engine blades, the scientific selection of metal materials stands as a core element in technological R&D. This article will explore the cost-effectiveness considerations in metal material selection in two parts, integrating laboratory testing techniques with engineering practice.
Flux compatibility issues with PCBA can actually lead to such severe consequences?!
A PCBA board for an audio product (using wave soldering) suffered burnout during operation. When using flux variant A, failure rates were high; after cleaning, the rate decreased slightly. Switching to flux variant B reduced the defect rate to zero. This paper will employ a series of professional testing and analytical methods to identify the root cause of the failure.
Online Customer Service
Business Consultation
Free Consultation
Report Inquiry
Back to Top
Contact Us
  • *Name:
  • *Contact:
  • *Email:
  • *Company/Organization/school:
  • *The location:
  • *Message information: